Separation of Powers: Whether immunity would upset the balance between executive, legislative, and judicial branches
Accountability vs. Functionality: Tension between holding leaders accountable and allowing them to govern without constant legal threats
Precedent Setting: How immunity decisions would affect future presidential conduct and legal expectations
Scope of Immunity: Whether immunity should apply to all official acts or only specific presidential functions
Criminal vs. Civil Liability: Different considerations for criminal prosecution versus civil lawsuits
Historical Context
Supreme Court precedent (Nixon v. Fitzgerald) grants qualified immunity for official acts
No historical precedent for absolute immunity from criminal prosecution
Previous presidents have faced subpoenas and legal scrutiny after leaving office
Practical Considerations
Risk of politicizing the justice system through selective prosecution
Potential for frivolous lawsuits against former presidents
Impact on a president's decision-making during crises
International comparisons with other democracies' approaches
By voting, you’ll also get daily polls and news updates from ConstitutionUS. You can unsubscribe at any time. By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.