Supreme Court Cases

 

Garza v. Idaho

Docket: 17-1026 Decision Date: 2019-02-27
View Official PDF
This links to the official slip opinion PDF.
How to read this page

Below are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Garza v. Idaho and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).

Summary

A short, plain-English overview of Garza v. Idaho.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This decision stems from a case where Indiana sought civil forfeiture of Tyson Timbs's vehicle, which was deemed disproportionate to his offense. The Court emphasized the historical and logical basis for incorporating the Excessive Fines Clause as a fundamental protection.

Holding

The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Garza v. Idaho.

The Court held that the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause is an incorporated protection applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

Constitutional Concepts

These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Garza v. Idaho. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.

  • Why Excessive Fines is relevant to Garza v. Idaho

    The case directly addresses the applicability of the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause to the states.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    Held: The Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause is an incorporated protection applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
  • Why Substantive Due Process is relevant to Garza v. Idaho

    The case involves the incorporation of a Bill of Rights protection through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates and renders applicable to the States Bill of Rights protections 'fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty,' or 'deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition.'

Key Quotes

Short excerpts from the syllabus in Garza v. Idaho that support the summary and concepts above.

  • The Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause is an incorporated protection applicable to the States.
  • Protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history for good reason.
  • The historical and logical case for concluding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Excessive Fines Clause is indeed overwhelming.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.