National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston.
The Supreme Court reviewed the NCAA's compensation restrictions for student-athletes under antitrust principles. The Court affirmed the district court's injunction against certain NCAA rules limiting education-related benefits, finding them inconsistent with established antitrust principles. The decision was based on the rule of reason analysis, which assessed the actual effect on competition.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston.
The Court held that the district court's injunction is consistent with established antitrust principles.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Commerce Clause is relevant to National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston
The case involves the NCAA's compensation rules affecting interstate commerce, which is central to the Sherman Act analysis.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)These compensation limits affect interstate commerce.
-
Why Judicial Review is relevant to National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston
The Court reviews and affirms the lower court's application of antitrust principles under the Sherman Act.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The district court's injunction is consistent with established antitrust principles.
-
Why Remedies and Relief is relevant to National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston
The Court discusses the appropriateness of the district court's injunction as a remedy for the antitrust violation.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The district court's injunction honored these principles, though.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston that support the summary and concepts above.
The district court's injunction is consistent with established antitrust principles.
The courts below properly subjected the NCAA's compensation restrictions to antitrust scrutiny under a 'rule of reason' analysis.
The NCAA's remaining attacks on the district court's decision lack merit.
