Supreme Court Cases

 

ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.

Docket: 21-401 Decision Date: 2022-06-13
View Official PDF
This links to the official slip opinion PDF.
How to read this page

Below are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).

Summary

A short, plain-English overview of ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd..

The Supreme Court addressed whether certain arbitration panels qualify as 'foreign or international tribunals' under 28 U.S.C. § 1782. The cases involved arbitration proceedings where parties sought discovery in the U.S. The Court determined that only governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative bodies meet the criteria of § 1782, excluding private arbitration panels.

Holding

The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd..

The Court held that only a governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative body constitutes a 'foreign or international tribunal' under 28 U.S.C. § 1782.

Constitutional Concepts

These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.

  • Why Judicial Review is relevant to ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.

    The Court's decision involves interpreting the scope of 28 U.S.C. § 1782, which is a form of judicial review of statutory interpretation.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    Held: Only a governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative body constitutes a 'foreign or international tribunal' under 28 U. S. C. § 1782, and the bodies at issue in these cases do not qualify.

Key Quotes

Short excerpts from the syllabus in ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. that support the summary and concepts above.

  • Only a governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative body constitutes a 'foreign or international tribunal' under 28 U. S. C. § 1782.
  • The statute thus presumes that a 'foreign tribunal' follows 'the practice and procedure of the foreign country.'
  • Interpreting § 1782 to reach only bodies exercising governmental authority is consistent with Congress' charge to the Commission.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.