Supreme Court Cases

 

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

Docket: 24-1287 Decision Date: 2026-02-20
View Official PDF
This links to the official slip opinion PDF.
How to read this page

Below are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).

Summary

A short, plain-English overview of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump.

The Supreme Court addressed whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) allows the President to impose tariffs. The Court concluded that IEEPA does not authorize such actions, emphasizing that Congress did not delegate its tariff-setting power to the President. The decision vacated the lower court's ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and affirmed the judgment in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump.

Holding

The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump.

The Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.

Constitutional Concepts

These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.

  • Why Executive Power is relevant to Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

    The case examines the limits of the President's authority to impose tariffs under IEEPA, which relates to the scope of executive power.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    The Government thus concedes that the President enjoys no inherent authority to impose tariffs during peacetime.
  • Why Nondelegation is relevant to Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

    The Court's decision involves the nondelegation doctrine, questioning whether Congress delegated its tariff-setting power to the President through IEEPA.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    The Court has long expressed 'reluctan[ce] to read into ambiguous statutory text' extraordinary delegations of Congress’s powers.
  • Why Spending Power is relevant to Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

    The case involves Congress's power to levy tariffs, which is part of its taxing and spending powers.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution specifies that 'The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.'

Key Quotes

Short excerpts from the syllabus in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that support the summary and concepts above.

  • IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.
  • The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch.
  • Congress’s pattern of usage is plain: When Congress grants the power to impose tariffs, it does so clearly and with careful constraints.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.