Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA.
The Supreme Court reviewed whether fuel producers had standing to challenge the EPA's approval of California's regulations requiring more electric vehicles. The Court found that the producers demonstrated standing due to monetary injury from decreased fuel demand. The case involved the balance of state and federal authority in environmental regulation.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA.
The Court held that the fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge EPA's approval of the California regulations.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Standing is relevant to Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA
The Court's decision focused on whether the fuel producers had Article III standing to challenge the EPA's approval of California's regulations.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Held: The fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge EPA's approval of the California regulations. Pp. 110–126.
-
Why Judicial Review is relevant to Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA
The case involves the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate the EPA's approval of state regulations.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Redressability requires demonstrating that judicial relief would likely redress the injury. Ibid.
-
Why State–Federal Power is relevant to Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA
The case involves the interaction between federal EPA approval and state-level regulations, implicating the balance of state and federal authority.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)EPA's approval authorized California and 17 other States to enforce regulations requiring lower emissions and vehicle electrification.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA that support the summary and concepts above.
The fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge EPA's approval of the California regulations.
The regulations likely cause the fuel producers' monetary injuries because reducing gasoline and diesel fuel consumption is the whole point of the regulations.
Invalidating the regulations would likely result in more revenue from additional fuel sales based on commonsense economic principles and record evidence.
