Procedural Due Process — related Supreme Court cases
This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Procedural Due Process”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.
“Procedural Due Process” is:
Whether the government provided fair procedures such as notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Source: Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).
Cases
These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.
-
Klein v. Martin
26th January 2026
The case involves the application of AEDPA standards, which relate to the procedural fairness in federal habeas corpus proceedings.
-
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
20th January 2026
The case involves the application of procedural rules regarding the timeliness of motions to vacate judgments, which relates to the fairness of legal procedures.
-
Berk v. Choy
20th January 2026
The decision addresses the procedural requirements for filing a lawsuit in federal court.
-
Case v. Montana
14th January 2026
The case involves the procedural aspect of how the police can enter a home without a warrant, which ties into procedural due process considerations.
-
Bowe v. United States
9th January 2026
The case involves procedural rules governing postconviction relief and the certification process for successive motions.
-
Pitts v. Mississippi
24th November 2025
The case discusses the requirement for a court to 'hear evidence' and make a 'case-specific' finding, implicating procedural fairness.
-
Clark v. Sweeney
24th November 2025
The Court's decision focused on the procedural error of the Fourth Circuit in considering a claim not raised by the parties, which implicates procedural due process principles.
