Remedies and Relief — related Supreme Court cases
This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Remedies and Relief”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.
“Remedies and Relief” is:
Limits on the types and scope of remedies a court may order.
Source: Article III Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).
Cases
These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.
-
Goldey v. Fields
30th June 2025
The Court's decision focuses on whether a Bivens remedy is available for Eighth Amendment violations, which directly pertains to the scope of judicial remedies.
-
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
26th June 2025
The Court examines whether private parties can seek remedies under § 1983 for violations of federal statutes like Medicaid, which typically rely on federal funding termination as a remedy.
-
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
20th June 2025
The decision discusses the scope of relief that district courts can provide, particularly in terms of not being bound by agency orders in enforcement proceedings.
-
Commissioner v. Zuch
12th June 2025
The decision discusses the limits on the Tax Court's authority to provide relief beyond enjoining a levy, such as ordering refunds or issuing declaratory judgments.
-
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.
26th February 2025
The case primarily deals with the scope of remedies available under the Lanham Act, specifically the calculation of 'defendant's profits' and whether affiliates' profits can be included.
-
Lackey v. Stinnie
25th February 2025
The Court's decision focuses on whether the preliminary injunction constitutes enduring judicial relief that materially alters the legal relationship between the parties.
