Supreme Court Cases

 

Remedies and Relief — related Supreme Court cases

This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Remedies and Relief”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.

“Remedies and Relief” is:

Limits on the types and scope of remedies a court may order.

Source: Article III Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).

Cases

These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.

  • Goldey v. Fields 30th June 2025
    The Court's decision focuses on whether a Bivens remedy is available for Eighth Amendment violations, which directly pertains to the scope of judicial remedies.
  • Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic 26th June 2025
    The Court examines whether private parties can seek remedies under § 1983 for violations of federal statutes like Medicaid, which typically rely on federal funding termination as a remedy.
  • McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. 20th June 2025
    The decision discusses the scope of relief that district courts can provide, particularly in terms of not being bound by agency orders in enforcement proceedings.
  • Commissioner v. Zuch 12th June 2025
    The decision discusses the limits on the Tax Court's authority to provide relief beyond enjoining a levy, such as ordering refunds or issuing declaratory judgments.
  • BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman 5th June 2025
    The case discusses the limits on the types and scope of remedies a court may order, specifically the standards for granting relief under Rule 60(b)(6).
  • Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. 26th February 2025
    The case primarily deals with the scope of remedies available under the Lanham Act, specifically the calculation of 'defendant's profits' and whether affiliates' profits can be included.
  • Lackey v. Stinnie 25th February 2025
    The Court's decision focuses on whether the preliminary injunction constitutes enduring judicial relief that materially alters the legal relationship between the parties.
  • Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. 27th June 2024
    The case centers on whether the bankruptcy code allows for a discharge of claims against nondebtors without claimant consent, which pertains to the scope of judicial remedies.
  • United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC 14th June 2024
    The case primarily deals with determining the appropriate remedy for a constitutional violation related to nonuniform bankruptcy fees.
  • Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney 13th June 2024
    The case discusses the limits and application of equitable relief in the form of preliminary injunctions.
  • Arizona v. Navajo Nation 22nd June 2023
    The case addresses the scope of remedies the Navajo Nation seeks, specifically whether the United States must take affirmative steps to secure water.
  • MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC 19th April 2023
    The decision focuses on the availability and scope of appellate relief under § 363(m), which is a limitation on remedies and relief.
  • Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools 21st March 2023
    The central issue is whether the relief sought under ADA is also available under IDEA, which involves the scope of remedies.
  • Nance v. Ward 23rd June 2022
    The Court's decision involves determining the appropriate legal vehicle for seeking relief, which is central to the remedies available to the petitioner.
  • Vega v. Tekoh 23rd June 2022
    The Court's decision addresses whether a Miranda violation can provide a basis for a § 1983 claim, which involves the scope of judicial remedies.
  • Shoop v. Twyford 21st June 2022
    The case primarily deals with whether the All Writs Act can be used to order transportation for evidence gathering in a habeas case, which relates to the scope of remedies a court may order.
  • Golan v. Saada 15th June 2022
    The case addresses the scope of remedies a court may order under the Hague Convention, specifically whether ameliorative measures must be considered.
  • Garland v. Gonzalez 13th June 2022
    The case primarily deals with the scope of judicial authority to grant class-wide injunctive relief under the INA.
  • Egbert v. Boule 8th June 2022
    The Court's decision focuses on whether a Bivens cause of action should be extended to provide a remedy for the alleged constitutional violations.
  • Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller 28th April 2022
    The Court's decision focuses on the availability of emotional distress damages as a remedy under Spending Clause statutes.
  • Brown v. Davenport 21st April 2022
    The case addresses the limits on federal habeas relief under AEDPA, which is a form of judicial remedy.
  • Ramirez v. Collier 24th March 2022
    The Court's decision involves the issuance of a preliminary injunction, which is a form of equitable relief.
  • National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston 21st June 2021
    The Court discusses the appropriateness of the district court's injunction as a remedy for the antitrust violation.
  • California v. Texas 17th June 2021
    The Court discussed the lack of a remedy that would redress the plaintiffs' alleged injuries.
  • CIC Servs., LLC v. IRS 17th May 2021
    The case discusses the type of relief sought by CIC, focusing on setting aside the IRS notice rather than addressing the tax penalty directly.
  • AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC 22nd April 2021
    The Court's decision focuses on the types of remedies the FTC can seek under § 13(b) of the FTC Act, particularly whether it includes monetary relief.
  • Tanzin v. Tanvir 10th December 2020
    The Court's holding focuses on the availability of monetary damages as a form of relief under RFRA against federal officials in their individual capacities.
  • Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc. 6th July 2020
    The Court applies severability principles to remedy the unconstitutional provision by severing the government-debt exception.
  • Liu v. SEC 22nd June 2020
    The case primarily deals with the scope of equitable relief that the SEC can seek, specifically whether disgorgement qualifies as such under the statutory framework.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.