Supreme Court Cases

 

Right to Jury Trial — related Supreme Court cases

This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Right to Jury Trial”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.

“Right to Jury Trial” is:

Right to have factual issues decided by a jury rather than a judge.

Source: Sixth Amendment Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).

Cases

These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.

  • Clark v. Sweeney 24th November 2025
    The issue of Juror 4's independent investigation and subsequent dismissal touches on the integrity of the jury trial process.
  • Perttu v. Richards 18th June 2025
    The Court's decision hinges on whether the Seventh Amendment requires a jury trial when the exhaustion issue is intertwined with the merits of a claim.
  • SEC v. Jarkesy 27th June 2024
    The Court held that the Seventh Amendment entitles a defendant to a jury trial when the SEC seeks civil penalties for securities fraud.
  • Erlinger v. United States 21st June 2024
    The Court held that a jury must determine whether past offenses were committed on separate occasions for ACCA purposes.
  • Smith v. United States 15th June 2023
    The case involves the Vicinage Clause, which is part of the Sixth Amendment's jury trial rights.
  • United States v. Tsarnaev 4th March 2022
    The case involves the discretion of the trial judge in jury selection and the questions asked to prospective jurors, which is a key aspect of the right to a fair jury trial.
  • Greer v. United States 14th June 2021
    The case discusses the necessity of jury instructions regarding the defendant's knowledge of their felon status, which is a factual issue for the jury to decide.
  • Edwards v. Vannoy 17th May 2021
    The case centers on whether the right to a unanimous jury verdict, as established in Ramos, applies retroactively on federal collateral review.
  • Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 5th April 2021
    The Court addressed the role of the jury in determining facts related to fair use, distinguishing between factual findings and legal conclusions.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.