Supreme Court Cases

Cases

These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.

• Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections 14th January 2026
  The core issue addressed by the Court is whether Congressman Bost has standing to challenge the election rules.
• Gutierrez v. Saenz 26th June 2025
  The Court's decision focused on whether Gutierrez had standing to bring his § 1983 claim.
• Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA 20th June 2025
  The Court's decision focused on whether the fuel producers had Article III standing to challenge the EPA's approval of California's regulations.
• FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. 20th June 2025
  The Court's decision hinges on whether retailers have standing to challenge the FDA's denial order, a key component of standing doctrine.
• NRC v. Texas 18th June 2025
  The decision focuses on who qualifies as a 'party aggrieved' and thus has the right to seek judicial review, which is a question of standing.
• Parrish v. United States 12th June 2025
  The case discusses the jurisdictional requirements for an appeal, which relates to the broader concept of standing and who may bring a case.
• Rivers v. Guerrero 12th June 2025
  The Court discusses Rivers's standing to appeal based on the potential redress of his injury.
• Commissioner v. Zuch 12th June 2025
  The case addresses whether there is a justiciable controversy for the Tax Court to resolve once the IRS is no longer pursuing a levy.
• Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos 5th June 2025
  The case involves the standing of a foreign government (Mexico) to bring a lawsuit in U.S. courts against American gun manufacturers.
• Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors 1st July 2024
  The case discusses the requirement for a plaintiff to have suffered an injury in order to bring an APA claim, which is related to standing.
• Murthy v. Missouri 26th June 2024
  The Court's decision primarily revolves around whether the plaintiffs have Article III standing to seek an injunction.
• FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 13th June 2024
  The Court's decision focused on whether the plaintiffs had Article III standing to challenge the FDA's actions.
• Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. 6th June 2024
  The case revolves around whether Truck Insurance Exchange has standing as a 'party in interest' under § 1109(b) to object to the reorganization plan.
• FBI v. Fikre 19th March 2024
  The Court's analysis focuses on whether the case is moot, which directly relates to the standing and the requirement for a live controversy.
• Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer 5th December 2023
  The case likely involves the issue of standing, as it pertains to whether the respondent has the right to bring the case in federal court.
• Biden v. Nebraska 30th June 2023
  The Court's decision to hear the case involves a significant discussion of standing, particularly whether Missouri has standing to challenge the Secretary's program.
• Department of Education v. Brown 30th June 2023
  The Court's decision is based on the respondents' lack of Article III standing, which is central to the holding.
• Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College 29th June 2023
  The Court discusses whether Students for Fair Admissions has standing to bring the case, which is essential for the Court's jurisdiction.
• United States v. Texas 23rd June 2023
  The Court's decision primarily revolves around whether Texas and Louisiana have Article III standing to challenge the immigration-enforcement guidelines.
• Yegiazaryan v. Smagin 22nd June 2023
  The Court's analysis of whether Smagin has alleged a 'domestic injury' under RICO relates to his standing to bring the suit.
• United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. 16th June 2023
  The case discusses the rights and roles of relators in FCA actions, which relates to who has the right to bring a case.
• Haaland v. Brackeen 15th June 2023
  The Court addresses whether the parties have standing to bring certain constitutional claims, including equal protection and nondelegation challenges.
• Tyler v. Hennepin County 25th May 2023
  The Court addressed whether Tyler had standing to bring her takings claim.
• Gonzalez v. Google LLC 18th May 2023
  The Court evaluates whether the plaintiffs' complaint states a plausible claim for relief, which is related to the concept of standing.
• Polselli v. IRS 18th May 2023
  The case discusses who has the right to bring a motion to quash an IRS summons, which relates to the concept of standing.
• Reed v. Goertz 19th April 2023
  The Court addressed whether Reed had standing to bring his procedural due process claim.
• Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools 21st March 2023
  The case discusses the ability of Mr. Perez to bring a lawsuit under ADA without exhausting IDEA procedures, which implicates standing.
• West Virginia v. EPA 30th June 2022
  The Court addressed whether the petitioners had standing to challenge the D.C. Circuit's decision, which is a constitutional requirement for judicial review.
• Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 23rd June 2022
  The case primarily deals with the right of North Carolina's legislative leaders to intervene in the litigation, which involves questions of who has the right to participate in a federal court case.
• Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana 15th June 2022
  The decision discusses the standing of plaintiffs to maintain non-individual PAGA claims once individual claims are arbitrated.
• Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco 15th June 2022
  The petitioners' ability to intervene in the litigation to defend the Public Charge Rule implicates standing and related procedural issues.
• Garland v. Gonzalez 13th June 2022
  The case addresses whether the District Courts had jurisdiction to grant class-wide relief, implicating standing and jurisdictional requirements.
• Federal Election Comm’n v. Ted Cruz 16th May 2022
  The Court discusses whether the appellees have standing to challenge the enforcement of Section 304, which is a requirement under Article III.
• Badgerow v. Walters 31st March 2022
  The decision addresses the requirements for federal jurisdiction, which relates to standing and the ability to bring a case in federal court.
• Houston Community College System v. Wilson 24th March 2022
  The issue of standing was addressed as the District Court initially dismissed the complaint on this basis, which was later reversed by the Fifth Circuit.
• Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P. S. C. 3rd March 2022
  The case addresses whether the Attorney General should be allowed to intervene in the appeal, which is related to the concept of standing and who has the right to participate in a case.
• Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson 10th December 2021
  The issue of standing is addressed as Mr. Dickson moved to dismiss, claiming that the petitioners lacked standing to sue him.
• Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee 1st July 2021
  The Court discusses the standing of the petitioners to appeal the decision, which is a threshold issue in the case.
• TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez 25th June 2021
  The Court's decision focused on whether the plaintiffs had Article III standing, specifically whether they suffered a concrete injury.
• California v. Texas 17th June 2021
  The Court's decision was based on the plaintiffs' lack of standing to challenge the statute.
• Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe 17th June 2021
  The case involves determining whether the respondents have the right to bring a claim under the ATS based on the alleged conduct.
• Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. 25th March 2021
  The case involves determining the proper forum for the plaintiffs to bring their claims, which is related to standing and jurisdiction.
• Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 8th March 2021
  The case primarily addresses whether a request for nominal damages can satisfy the redressability requirement for Article III standing.
• Brownback v. King 25th February 2021
  The case discusses subject-matter jurisdiction, which is closely related to standing, as it determines the court's ability to hear the case.
• Trump v. New York 18th December 2020
  The Court's decision was based on the lack of standing, as the plaintiffs could not show concrete harm.
• Carney v. Adams 10th December 2020
  The Court's decision focused on whether Adams had the necessary standing to bring the case, specifically whether he suffered a 'personal,' 'concrete,' and 'imminent' injury.
• June Medical Services L. L. C. v. Russo 29th June 2020
  The Court addressed the issue of standing, affirming that the abortion providers had the standing to assert the constitutional rights of their patients.
• Agency for Int’l Development v. Alliance for Open Society 29th June 2020
  The case involves the question of whether American organizations can assert First Amendment rights on behalf of their foreign affiliates.