The 3rd Amendment to the United States Constitution Explained

Introduction

The Declaration of American Independence is a much-admired document, praised for its simplicity, the sentiments expressed therein, and the eloquent language. It is at the heart of the United States Constitution, which was drawn up to establish a legal basis for the new country’s governance.

It has to be remembered, though, that the Constitution and the first ten amendments to it were drawn up when British military force and administrative behavior were fresh in the founding fathers’ minds. Each of these early amendments deals with a different problem that faced the fledgling nation. The 3rd Amendment is a good example of this.

The origins of the 3rd Amendment

The Great Britain government saw the British military presence in the American colonies on American soil as providing protection. Accordingly, they saw nothing wrong in forcing the colonial populations to accommodate British soldiers in private citizens’ homes. This process of billeting British troops on the civilian population was extremely unpopular.

While the British government was happy for the colonists to accommodate soldiers, mostly at their own expense, the hosts differed in their view. Most Americans saw it as an imposition and a challenge to their right to privacy and freedom to carry on with their lives unhindered.

This billeting of soldiers and troops in private homes was one of the sparks that set the American Revolution exploding.

When the Constitution was being drawn up, it was felt that provision should be made to prevent the new government from using similar tactics with the army. The result was the 3rd Amendment, which states:

“No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in times of war, but a manner prescribed by law.”

This means that soldiers could only be billeted with the house owner’s express permission. If billeting is needed in wartime, then appropriate laws must be passed to permit it.

As time passed, the terms of the 3rd Amendment became less relevant. The expansion of the United States westwards saw forts and barracks being built to accommodate soldiers. The Spanish-American war was largely played out beyond the United States’ borders, and this was also the case in World War I and World War II. The 3rd Amendment has, therefore, been described as archaic and irrelevant.

Recent events

In 2020, the terms of the 3rd Amendment came back into public discussion. The civil unrest that followed George Floyd’s death and other black African-Americans brought a speedy response from President Trump.

On June 1st, he invoked the Insurrection Act 1807. National Guard Troops were deployed across America to those cities where protests had been loudest. It has been estimated that some 75,000 National Guardsmen had been sent to “protect life and preserve property, peace and public safety.”

A few commentators have discussed the possibility of billeting National Guardsmen and police officers, given the numbers involved. IN PARTICULAR, Washington DC was seen at risk of billeting as around 4,500 were on duty in the city. No billeting has taken place at the time of writing and is unlikely to do so, but the risk has brought the 3rd Amendment back into the public eye.

close

We would like to send you an update when we post extra content to our blog.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Leaving a comment is the best way to voice your opinion about the constitution or other matters. ConstitutionUS.com is happy to hear all views and discussions. All comments are moderated, although are not refused based on standpoint. We try to take an unbiased stance.

Leaving a comment is also the best way to reach the management team of ConstitutionUS.com . If it is a private message, then it won’t be published.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Edit